3001-1/1

PRODUCTIVITY MISSIONS, THE INSTANCE OF FRANCE AFTER W.W.II

Terushi Hara

Waseda University

During the period W.W.II, due to the capital assistance of the Marshall plan France experienced a high rate of growth. Productivity missions that were dispatched from France to the United States played a very important role in this growth.

The purpose of this paper will be to analyze the role of the French productivity missions to the United States. This analysis will include 4 sections. Section I will be an analysis of the organization of these missions. In this section, I will present a clear analysis of the impetus behind the actions of the missions, the 3 different forms that the missions took, and the participants in the missions themselves.

The second section will include a look at the origin of the missions, the preparations for the missions and their activities in the U.S. The contents of this section are based on an interview that I conducted in 1992 with R. Donn. R. Donn was the person at the French embassy in Washington DC engaged in bringing the missions to the U.S. According to Mr. Donn, plans to visit the U.S. were initiated by the French side. This section will also include a look at the process by which the missions, with the aid of American capital assistance, were realized.

The third section will include an analysis of the actual condition of American management that the productivity missions saw. In this section, I will describe the American management methods that appeared in the reports of the missions; American management that was observed by the missions and the American management as was seen by the laborers. Each participant praised the American management system as being very efficient.

The fourth section will be an examination of the changes that the missions brought about in France’s economy and management. According to an analysis of the results of a survey of the managers who participated in the productivity missions, many of them after returning to France, applied what they had learned in the U.S. The missions were very fruitful. As a next step, it would be interesting to analyze, one by one, how the techniques that the industries that participated in the missions learned were applied in each instance.

3002-1/1

THE DEVELOPMENT OF POTTERY INDUSTRY AND THE LOCAL TRADE ASSOCIATIONS IN THE LATTER HALF OF THE MEIJI PERIOD

Kazuhiro Omori

Aichi Gakusen University

In this paper we examine the activities of the local trade associations (dogyo kumiai) in the case of pottery industry. In the latter half of the Meiji period, the production of the pottery increased, and some traditional production districts like Nagoya, Seto, Tono, Tokoname, Kyoto and Arita continued to increase their output. Out of these districts we select Seto, Tokoname and Kyoto, and investigate the activities of the trade associations in these three districts.

In Seto district a large quantity of tableware was produced and the ratio of the export to the total output was high. In Tokoname the earthen pipe for the domestic market was mainly produced. And in Kyoto much of the ornament was exported to the foreign-market. So, judging from the markets for their products and the makeup of them, these production areas can be classified into three different types.

The trade association in Seto carried out the inspection of manufactured goods, held exhibitions and contests, assisted exhibition hall financially, and mined and distributed potter’s clay. But tableware was not inspected by the trade association. In Tokoname the trade association inspected ear-then pipe and conducted various researches. And in Kyoto .the trade association held exhibitions and contests and supported financially the municipal Pottery research center.

These three trade associations did not act in the same way. We find that the activities of these trade associations were influenced by the difference of the markets for their products, the makeup of them and the supply side conditions of the potter’s clay. And therefore the activities of them contributed effectively to the development of pottery industry in each production district.

3003-1/2

THE FORMATIVE PROCESS OF THE TOP-MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE OF A TRUNK-LINE RAILWAY COMPANY DURING THE 1880s

Naofumi Nakamura

University of Tokyo

In the 1880s, a lot of railway companies were established in Japan. Many of them were promoted by provincial governors, for the purpose of stimulating of the development of industry in. local communities. Therefore, in the early years, the railway companies had problems becoming independent of local interests.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the formative process of the top-management structure of Kyushu Railway Company from 1886 to 1890, and to shed light on the relationship between a railway company and local communities in modern Japan.

The conclusion of this paper is as follows:

1. At the start, the top-management structure of Kyushu Railway Company was a council system, where in the major directors represented local communities. The first aim of the company president was to achieve independence from the representative who disregarded making a profit.

2. At first, the president included stockbrokers in the board of directors. There were two purposes for this. One was for smooth fund-raising, and the other was to increase the number of board members opposed to the representative of local communities.

3. But fund-raising was stymied by the panic of 1890, and the supervision of local communities was difficult to overcome. Alternatively, the railway president managed to enlist zaibatsu capitalists as stockholders and brought them on to board of directors, moreover the president issue a bond for new fund-raising. These measures achieved their purpose in 1900, after which the Kyushu Railway Company was no longer dependent on the local communities.

3003-2/2

COMPARISON BETWEEN MITSUI-BUSSAN AND MITSUBISHI-SHOJI ON THE OIL BUSINESS AFTER WORLD WAR II

Gakuya Hirai

Keio University

Before World War II, Mitsui-bussan (MBK) was the biggest general trading company in Japan, which used to have a great difference on gross sales from other domestic general trading companies. But nowadays, MBK is one of the five biggest general trading companies (other are Mitsubishi-shoji, Marubeni, Itochu-shoji, and Sumitomo-shoji), so the great lead of MBK from others has been losing gradually after the war.

Instead of decling of MBK, Mitsubishi-shoji (MC) had kept the top position on gross sales in 70% and 80%.

This contrast between two companies was represented on fuel business, especially on oil business after the war. MC had gained gross Sales on the oil business by building a close relationship with petroleum exporting countries and international petroleum corporations, and MC succeeded in importing LNG (liquid natural gas) from Alaska and Brunei.

Sales of MBK’s oil business were always lower than that of MC. So BMK carried out the project of boring petroleum and producing petrochemical materials at Iran in 70% and 80%. But MBK was suffered heavy losses by failing both of projects.

The gap of two companies was derived from the result of the re-unification. After World War II, MBK and MC were dissolved by Occupation policy. Both of companies were divided in many companies. Later, MC accomplished the re-unification in 1954, and MBK also did in 1959.

But, in the process of reunification, most of competent person on oil division of former MBK organized General-bussan company (General oil company now), and they also acquired all of trade rights on oil business of former MBK. And they didn’t take part in the re-unification of new MBK. Therefore new MBK failed to gather human resources and trade failed to gather human resources and trade rights on oil business.

On the other hand, in MC, most of competent person on oil division of former MC moved to other companies, too. But new companies which were founded after dissolution revived many trade rights on oil business of former MC. And they trained many men talented on oil business. Moreover most of there companies participated in the re-unification of new MC. As a result, new MC successed in gathering human resources and trade rights on oil business.

3004-1/2

COMPLEMENTARITY: AN UNDERCURRENT IN THE HISTORY OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN JAPAN

Kenji Okuda

University of East Asia

The modernization of human resource management in Japanese industry was realized by way of introduction of various systems from advanced Western countries. The basic philosophy underlying such modern human resource management systems is anchored in the concept of dichotomy.

Needless to say, F. W. Taylor’s scientific management system is the foremost example of this: the status and role of those in management and those subjected to management are sharply divided. Management monopolizes the power to decide about every minute detail of operation: those at the bottom of the hierarchy just are supposed to obey orders from above.

Introduction of Taylor’s system into Japanese industry took place in the 1920’s, and 1930’s, against the background of a fierce debate on how to evaluate scientific management within the Japanese context. One group of industrial engineers argued that workers at the workshop level should be treated not as mere objects of time and motion study, but rather as equal partner in any such study.

These engineers attached prime importance to the rich implicit knowledge which workers naturally have on how to improve their own operations. In other word, according to this group of engineers there ought to be no dichotomy between the’ roles of shop-level workers and engineers; instead they preferred considering these respective role as mutually complementary.

The author wondered what was the origin of the concept of complementarity in Japan. His hypothesis implies that this concept has been an undercurrent of Japanese business philosophy since the middle of the Edo Period, around 1700-1800. Ideas about complementarity between management and labour were typically formulated in the works of thinkers like Ando Shoeki, Ishida Baigan, Ninomiya Sontoku and Tanaka Kyugu; Section II and III of this paper provide on evaluation of such works. Then, in Section IV the author proceeds to analyze the complementarity related philosophy and behavior of business leaders like Ohara Magosaburo, Shibusawa Eiichi and so forth who were active in the 1920’s, and 1930’s. In addition, Section IV also covers some representative examples of complementarity-based business patterns in the period after WW II, including a few cases of superior performance levels in the development of new car models in the automotive industry.

Section V, finally, stresses the author’s conviction that the concept of complementarity is not unique to Japan, but rather is of universal value.

3004-2/2

DEVELOPMENT AND STRATEGIES OF HIZEN PORCELAIN INDUSTRY IN 1870-90S

Takehisa Yamada

Nara Sangyo University

Since the Hizen Porcelain Industry had started selling to European, American and Chinese merchants in 1860s, the Arita merchants conceived brands and selected designs to be reflected in the products made by manufacturers. In 1870s, Hizen Porcelain Industry sold on World Exhibitions and exported many products directly to European countries and America. The porcelain companies exported also directly while selling to foreign merchants in Nagasaki and Yokohama. Such strategies were adopted according to the changing conditions in internal and external markets.

Around 1890, the Japanese merchants who lost their share in foreign ‘markets gradually shifted to sales of both traditional and modern porcelain products in various national districts. Under unfavorable exporting conditions, Arita merchants united with manufacturers in their production and export activities. This reaction resulted in an integrated brand of Hizen Porcelain Industry which in turn, implied higher competition within the Japanese porcelain market itself.